Comparison – Leica M9 // Contax G2 Tri-X

Rock and roll model in street

Leica M9 – Konica Hexanon-M 50mm B&W Jpeg

Rock and roll model in street

Contax G2 – 45mm Zeiss Planar – Kodak Tri-X

I just had these two frames sat next to one another on the screen and found the comparison interesting. Not a million miles apart to be honest.

Leica M9, 50mm Konica Hexanon-M f/2 (iso320 @ f/2) – B&W in camera JPEG plus a little Lightroom tweak to get it how I like

Contax G2, 45mm Zeiss Planar f/2, Kodak Tri-X (@400 @f/2) – Developed in Kodak D76(1:1) then Plustek Opticfilm 7400i scan (not rescanned or cleaned hence drying marks)

3 thoughts on “Comparison – Leica M9 // Contax G2 Tri-X

  1. Dominic,
    I think most discerning viewers prefer silver images to digital/ink images, but the crux of the matter is whether they are prepared to put the time and effort in to secure the scan, or silver print. And further, whether they have the skill to capture a well exposed, unseen, negative.

    It was, and still is, a chore to mask/selectively-sharpen and tone a wet print, choosing the best from three/four …. And then repeat it all for a different size, without notes, or a History folder.

    I’m happier to shoot film and scan. I wish I did it more often and my Monochrom is undermining the good intentions I have of returning to the darkroom.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s